Browse all content
|
Our methods and philosophiesThe problems we see | What we are doing about it | The steps we take to get there | Our core values
The problems we seeThe inability of ground-level organizations to put ICT to effective use is one of the most critical issues facing the world today. And a failure to foster local entrepreneurship to support ICT places the sustainability of donor-funded activities at risk. The massive scale of modern problems requires holistic and systemic solutions, whether you are talking about global climate change, the urgent need to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, indescribable health crises, threats to national security, or any other of the frightening scenarios that threaten the future of our species. Poverty exacerbates all of these problems, and education is clearly a crucial element. So where does information and communications technology fit in? In the modern world, ICT is a required tool that must be a part of the solutions to any of these problems in order to achieve the level of information sharing, coordination, and scale needed to make a global impact. ICT can increase efficiency and improve service delivery for social programs just like it does for business. But so far ICT is failing to deliver on its potential to improve development because many initiatives lack experience with ICT and fail to integrate it effectively into what they do. During recent years, much attention has been focused on the issues of the digital divide and ICT as a key enabler of socio-economic development, but there continues to be more talk than concrete results. There are many initiatives to bring technology infrastructure to developing countries, yet many people do not use it because of simple realities: they do not understand it, they are uncomfortable using it, they cannot afford it, or they cannot see its utility. The problem of integrating ICT into development is complex and manifests itself in different ways in different countries. It presents both practical and policy challenges. Moreover, it is apparent that solutions that work in the developed countries cannot simply be transplanted to developing country environments; solutions must be based on an understanding of local needs and conditions. Numerous government and ground-level initiatives are helping to put technology to use for social good, but too often they neglect factors that limit their success. Development initiatives need more pragmatic solutions that weigh the real tradeoffs and opportunities of using ICT to enhance existing services. What we are doing about itThe desire to drive change at a systemic level is at the heart of our mission. Bridges.org addresses these broad issues by acting as a catalyst for reform and promoting its holistic, integrated Real Access /Real Development /Real Impact strategy. We leverage our influence at both the international and local levels to promote new models for development, and act as an example of ICT-enabled development that is driven from the ground up. We push for development-aid efforts to be based on local needs and requirements, call for the private sector to think progressively about the developing world, and insist that governments engage with their citizens and organizations. We seek an end to the waste of limited resources, staggering levels of duplication, and solutions that are imposed rather than locally developed. We apply common sense and say what needs to be said. We also recognize that improving the way that ICT is used for development is an enormous task, and no one group could solve the problem on its own. We work closely with other organizations to fully understand the realities of ICT use and raise awareness of how ICT can be used to support their activities. We help shape and promote sustainable, replicable models for community ICT use, grounded on the needs, interests, and active participation of local residents. We support local entrepreneurship to identify and address business opportunities. We provide tools for government policymaking to provide coherent long-term plans for prosperity, and work at the highest levels of policymaking by informing national and international leaders about the ground-level realities that need to affect, and are affected by, their decisions. We provide facts about ICT access and use, create information toolkits, and offer grounded advice. We are committed to increasing awareness, establishing best practice, reducing duplication, and building local capacity. Our work provides thought leadership to improve the thinking about ICT and development, which in turn affects its implementation. The steps we take to get thereTo achieve our mission, we:
Our core valuesWe work in an environment where being underpaid and overworked is all too common, and there are many competing interests that vie for our time and attention. Sometimes even those with the best of intentions see their integrity put at risk. Like many others working in this field, we do our best. Our efforts are guided by the following core values:
Our Real Access / Real Impact strategy and methodologiesBridges.org has examined the ICT-based development field and considered what works, what does not work — and why. It has built on its own experience and the thinking of a number of other organizations to design a holistic, integrated strategy we call Real Access/Real Impact (RA/RI). This framework sets out the determining factors in whether there is Real Access to ICT: access that goes beyond computers and connections so that technology use makes a Real Impact on socio-economic development. It is not about a specific technology application that is used in a certain way. Rather, the RA/RI framework offers a roadmap to the digital divide that can be used to improve the way that ICT is integrated into initiatives in healthcare, education, small business development, government services and other programs in the countries and communities that have the most to gain. Financial measurements and organizational processes are established benchmarks for planning, monitoring and evaluating development projects; but these measurements often fall short in the ICT arena, insofar as they are insufficient to give a full understanding of the immeasurable benefits to society that ICT projects and policies bring, or external challenges they face. Gauging the number of computers and connections is relatively easy, but measuring the level of effective use of ICT is much more difficult. Traditional measurements also highlight project shortcomings, but usually fail to give specific guidance on what a project or policy process needs to do to improve. The Real Access/Real Impact approach can be used as a basis for the analysis, measurement, and implementation of initiatives on all levels, from the ground to high-level policy deliberations. The RA/RI methodologies can be used prescriptively (as part of a project-planning exercise), during a project (to inform decision-making along the way), or after-the-fact (to reflect on project successes and failures). They can also be used as the basis for technology research, or to inform policymaking processes. The RA/RI methodologies are widely applicable to efforts by communities, civil-society organizations, development-aid organizations, governments, and the business sector. RA/RI provides a fresh angle on the issues, prompts ideas for moving forward, and ensures an all-embracing approach. RA/RI considers whether people have the capacity to use ICT and whether they actually are using it, including analysis of the underlying factors that affect whether they do (or do not) and why. The RA/RI framework helps initiatives plan effectively and take concrete steps for implementing ICT as part of what they do, highlights the strengths of ICT projects and policies, and provides direction for future improvements. The two RA/RI methodologies together form an innovative framework for anticipating and evaluating the substantive and project administration issues that affect the success of ICT-based initiatives:
|