Browse all content
|
Comparison study of free/open source and proprietary software in an African context Submitted by Editor on 24 May, 2005 - 12:00.
Implementation and policy-making to optimise public access to ICT The first study of its kind in Africa, this report provides information and advice to people who want to make sound software choices for public computer labs in Africa. The two-year study looked at the software environments in 121 public-access computer labs in Namibia, South Africa and Uganda. The findings examine the factors that affect software choices, the realities of the current situation in Africa, and the long-term implications of software choices for Africa, considering both ground- and policy-level issues.
Table of contentsExecutive summaryAcknowledgements 1 Introduction 1.1 Public ICT access and software choices in Africa2 Overview of methodology and approach 2.1 Framing the study with a Real Access/Real Impact approach3 Overview of the countries studied 3.1 Namibia4 Findings on key issues influencing software choices 4.1 Appropriateness of software to local needs and conditions5 Observations and recommendations 5.1 Key observations of the study 6 Concluding remarks Annex 1. Terminology debate: free, open source, proprietary, commercial software AcknowledgementsThis report was made possible by the generous support of the International Development Research Center (IDRC) and the Open Society Institute (OSI). The research was conducted in collaboration with SchoolNet Africa and AITEC Uganda. Like all of our work, this report was a collaborative effort that drew on many members of the bridges.org team in various roles. We would especially like to recognise the contributions of Hillar Addo, Vincent W Bagiire, Jennifer Huesler, James Wire Lunghabo, Philipp Schmidt, Liam Smit, Paul Ssengooba. We would like to thank the 121 computer labs and 40 policy-makers that provided the information and data that this report is based upon; their willingness to engage and share experiences enriched this research immeasurably. Their names are not listed here, because all contributions were made anonymously. We are also grateful to the many organisations and individuals that introduced us to the computer labs and helped with logistical support. Finally, we would like to recognise the contributions of the advisory group members who gave us their time and attention throughout the study, including by reviewing and commenting on milestone documents and drafts. Their insight and advice helped ensure that the work remained balanced and objective. The group was comprised of experts in the field with diverse views on the topic:
|
DownloadsDownloads
Related topicsBrowse publications
|