<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.bridges.org">
<channel>
 <title>bridges.org - ICT policy, Commentaries</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13,61/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Interception and Monitoring Bill, 2001</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/InterceptionMonitoring</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On 13 August 2001, bridges.org submitted                                    the following comments on the proposed South                                    African &amp;quot;Interception and Monitoring&amp;quot;                                    bill: &amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;commentaries/120/media_release&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;read                                    the press release&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:55:24 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Civil Society meets to discuss input to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Empowerment Charter</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/121</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Civil Society representatives met in Cape Town on 8 September to discuss their needs and concerns regarding the ICT Empowerment Charter. The importance of the Charter has been recognised by bridges.org, the Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), SANGONeT and many other Civil Society and non-governmental organisations in South Africa that use ICT as part of their efforts for socio-economic development. There has been little opportunity for organizations like these to participate, and many people were simply not aware of the process. The meeting highlighted several areas which it hopes will be addressed at the next meeting of the ICT Charter working group.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:30:37 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Convergence: technological change and effective regulation can bring benefits to the developing world</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/109</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We tend to think about convergence in terms of technology alone, but convergence in information and communications technology (ICT) does not solely involve technological innovation, it also has a real impact on everyday lives that can potentially create further imbalances in terms of the digital divide, especially in the developing world. As an evolving concept, convergence encompasses a combination of opportunities and challenges, not only for the ICT industry, but also for regulators, policy makers and society at large. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:36:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Overview of The Electronic Communications and Transactions (ECT) Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/case_studies/125</link>
 <description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;u&gt;Background&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Electronic Communications and Transactions (ECT) Bill is the result of a democratic and consultative process that began in 1999 with the publication of a Discussion Paper designed to stimulate discussion and debate. This was followed in November 2000 by the publication of a Green Paper that highlighted the numerous legal and practical issues that would need to be addressed in a Bill. In order to fast-track the process, the Department of Communications (DoC) decided to dispense with the normal procedure of publishing of a White Paper -- which would have allowed for further consultation -- and tabled the current Bill as it stands, inviting only final public comments. The deadline for submitting comments was 8 May 2002 (see bridges.org&#039;s comments to the Government at http://www.bridges.org/e-policy/sa/ect/ ).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/1">Digital divide</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2002 18:53:44 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Letter to SA Dept of Communications: Telecommunications Amendment Bill number 65 of 2001</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/case_studies/112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ms R. Schaafsma&lt;br /&gt;The Secretary to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Communications&lt;br /&gt;PO Box 15&lt;br /&gt;Cape Town 8000&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dear Mr. Kekana,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;Bridges.org Analysis and Commentary: Telecommunications Amendment Bill number 65 of 2001&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/19">Countries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:23:20 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Telecommunication liberalization - what does it mean for the average citizen?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/case_studies/122</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The complex debate around telecommunications liberalization has already been faced in the developed world, and the issues now confront almost every developing country. The dilemmas are not unique to South Africa, but the current situation in this country illustrates the complex issues at stake and how real people are affected by the decisions of the government. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/1">Digital divide</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2001 18:37:26 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
