<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.bridges.org">
<channel>
 <title>bridges.org - e-Government, Commentaries</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5,61/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Civil Society meets to discuss input to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Empowerment Charter</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/121</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Civil Society representatives met in Cape Town on 8 September to discuss their needs and concerns regarding the ICT Empowerment Charter. The importance of the Charter has been recognised by bridges.org, the Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), SANGONeT and many other Civil Society and non-governmental organisations in South Africa that use ICT as part of their efforts for socio-economic development. There has been little opportunity for organizations like these to participate, and many people were simply not aware of the process. The meeting highlighted several areas which it hopes will be addressed at the next meeting of the ICT Charter working group.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:30:37 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Submission to SA Dept of Education on the Draft e-Education White Paper</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/116</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ICT Unit, Department Of Education&lt;br /&gt;Attention: Ms. Trudi van Wyk&lt;br /&gt;Room 619, Sol Plaatje House, 123 Schoeman Street&lt;br /&gt;Pretoria, 0001 SOUTH AFRICA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dear Ms. van Wyk,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bridges.org would like to take the opportunity afforded by the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Unit of the Department of Education to make written representations on the Draft White Paper on e-education approved by Cabinet on 27 August 2003. The White Paper sets out Government&#039;s response to a new ICT environment in education. The overarching goal of the White Paper is to equip every basic and Further Education and Training (FET) learner with the knowledge and skills to use ICT confidently, creatively and responsibly by 2013.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/4">e-Literacy and education</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:49:26 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Letter to ICASA: The provision of wireless Internet access using Industrial, Scientific and Medical frequencies</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/117</link>
 <description>&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;Ms. M. Msimang&lt;br /&gt;Senior Manager: Policy Analysis and Development&lt;br /&gt;ICASA&lt;br /&gt;Private Bag X1 &lt;br /&gt;Marlboro 2063 SOUTH AFRICA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;Dear Ms. Msimang,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;The provision of wireless Internet access using Industrial, Scientific and Medical frequencies &lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:56:52 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Convergence: technological change and effective regulation can bring benefits to the developing world</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/109</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We tend to think about convergence in terms of technology alone, but convergence in information and communications technology (ICT) does not solely involve technological innovation, it also has a real impact on everyday lives that can potentially create further imbalances in terms of the digital divide, especially in the developing world. As an evolving concept, convergence encompasses a combination of opportunities and challenges, not only for the ICT industry, but also for regulators, policy makers and society at large. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:36:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Debate between open source and proprietary software becomes real for developing countries</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/115</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Two recent announcements in South Africa raise sharp issues that characterize the raging debate between open source and Microsoft operating systems -- a debate that will ultimately affect developing countries around the world. Last Friday President Thabo Mbeki announced in his state-of-the nation speech to Parliament that Microsoft will provide free software for all of South Africa&#039;s 32,000 government schools. Previously, the South African Government&#039;s National Advisory Council on Innovation (NACI) declared its strong support for open source software, saying that it &amp;quot;has the potential to empower people in ways that proprietary software (such as Microsoft&#039;s) simply does not allow&amp;quot;. For a nation that is counting on information and communications technology (ICT) to help address monumental social and economic problems, Microsoft&#039;s generous offer can make a real difference. However, many argue that open source software is more appropriate for the technology realities in developing countries. The Government -- and public -- should be aware of the implications of adopting the proprietary operating system in schools, and plan wisely to gain the benefits without suffering the consequences.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/4">e-Literacy and education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/10">Free and open source software</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:50:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Letter to SA Dept of Communications: Telecommunications Amendment Bill number 65 of 2001</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/case_studies/112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ms R. Schaafsma&lt;br /&gt;The Secretary to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Communications&lt;br /&gt;PO Box 15&lt;br /&gt;Cape Town 8000&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dear Mr. Kekana,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;Bridges.org Analysis and Commentary: Telecommunications Amendment Bill number 65 of 2001&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/19">Countries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/13">ICT policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:23:20 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Media Release -- Watchdog needed to oversee implementation of the Interception And Monitoring Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/120/media_release</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;14 August 2001&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An independent commission that would serve as a watchdog to oversee implementation needs to be established before the proposed Interception and Monitoring Bill becomes law.&lt;br /&gt;This comment was made by bridges.org, a Cape Town based NGO promoting laws and policies fostering technology use in its written comments on the draft Interception and Monitoring Bill submitted to Parliament on Monday, 13 August.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:22:37 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bridges.org Analysis and Commentary: Interception and Monitoring Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.bridges.org/commentaries/118</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On 13 August 2001, bridges.org submitted the following comments on the proposed South African &amp;quot;Interception and Monitoring&amp;quot; bill: &amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;13 August 2001&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ms. C. Herzenberg&lt;br /&gt;The Secretary to Parliament&lt;br /&gt;P.O. Box 15&lt;br /&gt;Cape Town&lt;br /&gt;8000&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/61">Commentaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.bridges.org/taxonomy/term/5">e-Government</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:04:25 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
